arXiv:2611.09997v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Diffusion-based anomaly detectors reconstruct a test image towards normality, yet how much of an anomaly survives, its leak, remains uncharacterized. We show that a first-order deterministic sampler obeys an exact recursion along the anomaly, whose continuous limit is a survival law. The anomaly decays exponentially as the noise falls, at a rate set by the retention $r$, the share the model keeps on the states it visits. Because $r$ depends on the noise level and not on the step count, one measured path predicts the leak of other step counts, samplers and schedules from a nearby start to within a few hundredths, on four diffusion models and real defects. The law also shows that the leak's growth over steps is exposure bias and that normal details obey the same law, so changing the path or the training trades leak for detail error. We introduce SurvAD, which fine-tunes the reconstructor on inference-like starts and fits a comparator that adds evidence to the residual map without suppressing its ranking elsewhere. For under $2\%$ more inference time, SurvAD raises the multi-class pixel average precision (P-AP) of DeCo-Diff from $76.8$ to $80.7$ on MVTec AD and from $57.5$ to $60.0$ on VisA. It matches CostFilter-AD on the same reconstructor with $9\times$ fewer trainable parameters and, under Dinomaly's protocol, exceeds its reported P-AP on Dinomaly on both benchmarks.
Abstract: Diffusion-based anomaly detectors reconstruct a test image towards normality, yet how much of an anomaly survives, its leak, remains uncharacterized. We show that a first-order deterministic sampler obeys an exact recursion along the anomaly, whose continuous limit is a survival law. The anomaly decays exponentially as the noise falls, at a rate set by the retention $r$, the share the model keeps on the states it visits. Because $r$ depends on the noise level and not on the step count, one measured path predicts the leak of other step counts, samplers and schedules from a nearby start to within a few hundredths, on four diffusion models and real defects. The law also shows that the leak's growth over steps is exposure bias and that normal details obey the same law, so changing the path or the training trades leak for detail error. We introduce SurvAD, which fine-tunes the reconstructor on inference-like starts and fits a comparator that adds evidence to the residual map without suppressing its ranking elsewhere. For under $2\%$ more inference time, SurvAD raises the multi-class pixel average precision (P-AP) of DeCo-Diff from $76.8$ to $80.7$ on MVTec AD and from $57.5$ to $60.0$ on VisA. It matches CostFilter-AD on the same reconstructor with $9\times$ fewer trainable parameters and, under Dinomaly's protocol, exceeds its reported P-AP on Dinomaly on both benchmarks.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org