arXiv:2610.41487v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Long-context diffusion repeatedly pays for both token interaction and feed-forward computation. We formulate these costs as two separate budgets: the edges available to an attention graph and the experts activated for each token. This view connects local, dilated, and global attention with conditional expert computation without assuming that sparsity alone preserves document-level information. We specify normalized masked attention, distinguish denoising depth from sampling iterations, and derive graph and compute bounds. A reported sparse-expert configuration, denoted DualBudget, is analyzed across scientific summarization, multi-hop question answering, dialogue, and sentence-pair prediction. All supplied table measurements are retained. The length study shows gains over the listed baselines through 16K, together with measurable degradation as length increases. Ablations reveal mixed changes across the three reported scores, while the cost record indicates a 20% reduction relative to DiffuSeq under an unspecified timing convention. The analysis separates these observations from unmeasured claims about training speed, absorbing states, global coherence, and deployment memory.
Abstract: Long-context diffusion repeatedly pays for both token interaction and feed-forward computation. We formulate these costs as two separate budgets: the edges available to an attention graph and the experts activated for each token. This view connects local, dilated, and global attention with conditional expert computation without assuming that sparsity alone preserves document-level information. We specify normalized masked attention, distinguish denoising depth from sampling iterations, and derive graph and compute bounds. A reported sparse-expert configuration, denoted DualBudget, is analyzed across scientific summarization, multi-hop question answering, dialogue, and sentence-pair prediction. All supplied table measurements are retained. The length study shows gains over the listed baselines through 16K, together with measurable degradation as length increases. Ablations reveal mixed changes across the three reported scores, while the cost record indicates a 20% reduction relative to DiffuSeq under an unspecified timing convention. The analysis separates these observations from unmeasured claims about training speed, absorbing states, global coherence, and deployment memory.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Read the original article:
Sparse Text Diffusion under Dual Budgets: Context Connectivity and Expert Activation