arXiv:2611.12300v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Action theories typically fix their vocabulary and causal laws, whereas agent harnesses can change their tools, providers, and policies during execution. We introduce Reconfigurable Action Theories (RAT), in which actions can change the action theory itself. A theory module in RAT contains a vocabulary, causal laws, and an initializer. A RAT configuration records the active modules and the world state. Module loading and unloading are represented by actions governed by ordinary causal laws. RAT retains the standard causal action semantics of its language fragment when the active module set is fixed. We give sufficient conditions for at most one next configuration, preservation of existing behavior when a module is added, and equal results when modules are loaded in either order. We establish the computational complexity of reasoning tasks in RAT and translate finite RAT systems into nonmonotonic causal theories and Answer Set Programming (ASP), preserving bounded executions. Experiments compare finite RAT models with executions of official DeepSeek Harness, Pi, and OpenHands implementations. RAT provides a formal basis for checking how component changes affect a harness's available actions, behavior, and reachable goals.
Abstract: Action theories typically fix their vocabulary and causal laws, whereas agent harnesses can change their tools, providers, and policies during execution. We introduce Reconfigurable Action Theories (RAT), in which actions can change the action theory itself. A theory module in RAT contains a vocabulary, causal laws, and an initializer. A RAT configuration records the active modules and the world state. Module loading and unloading are represented by actions governed by ordinary causal laws. RAT retains the standard causal action semantics of its language fragment when the active module set is fixed. We give sufficient conditions for at most one next configuration, preservation of existing behavior when a module is added, and equal results when modules are loaded in either order. We establish the computational complexity of reasoning tasks in RAT and translate finite RAT systems into nonmonotonic causal theories and Answer Set Programming (ASP), preserving bounded executions. Experiments compare finite RAT models with executions of official DeepSeek Harness, Pi, and OpenHands implementations. RAT provides a formal basis for checking how component changes affect a harness's available actions, behavior, and reachable goals.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Read the original article:
Reconfigurable Action Theories: A Formal Foundation for Dynamically Composable Agent Harnesses