arXiv:2611.13024v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: As LLMs increasingly mediate everyday interactions, subtle gender biases in open-ended responses pose growing societal risks. Existing probing methods have two key limitations: they rely on fixed-format tasks, such as pronoun resolution or occupation association, that alignment-tuned models can easily handle; and they compare raw group-level rubric scores, ignoring per-dimension variance and obscuring which bias dimensions reliably distinguish gender groups. We introduce GRAP (Gender Rubric-Aware Probing), a framework that uses a lightweight logistic probe to identify the most discriminative bias dimensions from responses scored across 10 rubric dimensions, operating task-agnostically on open-ended instruction following.
Abstract: As LLMs increasingly mediate everyday interactions, subtle gender biases in open-ended responses pose growing societal risks. Existing probing methods have two key limitations: they rely on fixed-format tasks, such as pronoun resolution or occupation association, that alignment-tuned models can easily handle; and they compare raw group-level rubric scores, ignoring per-dimension variance and obscuring which bias dimensions reliably distinguish gender groups. We introduce GRAP (Gender Rubric-Aware Probing), a framework that uses a lightweight logistic probe to identify the most discriminative bias dimensions from responses scored across 10 rubric dimensions, operating task-agnostically on open-ended instruction following.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org