arXiv:2611.13669v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Reasoning about people's plans and goals based on their actions is fundamental to human social interaction and essential for cooperative, embodied artificial intelligence. Formalizing this capacity in naturalistic, embodied settings has been a longstanding challenge. Here, we present GenEA, a novel agent representation capable of reasoning over multi-step, long-horizon embodied plans. At the heart of GenEA lies a multilevel state-space that couples the coarse biomechanics of an articulated body and its interactions with nearby objects by extending the task-and-motion planning framework from robotics with simulation-based intuitive physics. By embedding this state-space in a generative model, GenEA yields a joint probability distribution over goals and embodied plans. Across several experiments spanning the qualitatively distinct domains of object manipulation and navigation, featuring diverse tasks and multiple behavioral measures, we show that GenEA, through simple transformations of this joint distribution, recapitulates how humans reason about embodied plans. Crucially, GenEA consistently outperforms strong alternative models, including plausible heuristics, standard task-and-motion planning, and a state-of-the-art vision-language model. GenEA thereby offers a new perspective on the architecture of human reasoning and social cognition, suggesting that embodied artificial intelligence systems seeking to seamlessly interact with humans should adopt GenEA-like generative models of action planning.
Abstract: Reasoning about people's plans and goals based on their actions is fundamental to human social interaction and essential for cooperative, embodied artificial intelligence. Formalizing this capacity in naturalistic, embodied settings has been a longstanding challenge. Here, we present GenEA, a novel agent representation capable of reasoning over multi-step, long-horizon embodied plans. At the heart of GenEA lies a multilevel state-space that couples the coarse biomechanics of an articulated body and its interactions with nearby objects by extending the task-and-motion planning framework from robotics with simulation-based intuitive physics. By embedding this state-space in a generative model, GenEA yields a joint probability distribution over goals and embodied plans. Across several experiments spanning the qualitatively distinct domains of object manipulation and navigation, featuring diverse tasks and multiple behavioral measures, we show that GenEA, through simple transformations of this joint distribution, recapitulates how humans reason about embodied plans. Crucially, GenEA consistently outperforms strong alternative models, including plausible heuristics, standard task-and-motion planning, and a state-of-the-art vision-language model. GenEA thereby offers a new perspective on the architecture of human reasoning and social cognition, suggesting that embodied artificial intelligence systems seeking to seamlessly interact with humans should adopt GenEA-like generative models of action planning.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org