arXiv:2602.18532v5 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Following the rise of large foundation models, Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) emerged, leveraging strong visual and language understanding from Vision-Language Models for general-purpose policy learning. Yet, the current VLA landscape remains fragmented and exploratory. Although many groups have proposed their own VLA models, inconsistencies in training protocols and evaluation settings make it difficult to identify which design choices truly matter. To bring structure to this evolving space, we reexamine the VLA design space under a unified framework and evaluation setup. Starting from a simple VLA baseline similar to RT-2, which is the origin of VLA, we systematically dissect design choices along three dimensions: foundational components, perception essentials, and action modeling perspectives. From this study, we distill 12 key findings that together form a practical recipe for building strong VLA models. The outcome of this exploration is a simple yet effective model, VLANeXt. It outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on the LIBERO and LIBERO-plus benchmarks and demonstrates strong performance in real-world experiments. Beyond identifying the core recipe, we further ask how far these design principles extend to the emerging paradigms in VLAs. We thus expand VLANeXt along several emerging directions, including model scaling, latent-action pretraining, latent predictive representation learning, and world action modeling. These studies give rise to the VLANeXt family, spanning compact and scaled VLA variants, latent-action models, JEPA-style predictive models, and World Action Models. Our results show that the core recipe provides a strong foundation across different model scales and emerging paradigms.
Abstract: Following the rise of large foundation models, Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) emerged, leveraging strong visual and language understanding from Vision-Language Models for general-purpose policy learning. Yet, the current VLA landscape remains fragmented and exploratory. Although many groups have proposed their own VLA models, inconsistencies in training protocols and evaluation settings make it difficult to identify which design choices truly matter. To bring structure to this evolving space, we reexamine the VLA design space under a unified framework and evaluation setup. Starting from a simple VLA baseline similar to RT-2, which is the origin of VLA, we systematically dissect design choices along three dimensions: foundational components, perception essentials, and action modeling perspectives. From this study, we distill 12 key findings that together form a practical recipe for building strong VLA models. The outcome of this exploration is a simple yet effective model, VLANeXt. It outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on the LIBERO and LIBERO-plus benchmarks and demonstrates strong performance in real-world experiments. Beyond identifying the core recipe, we further ask how far these design principles extend to the emerging paradigms in VLAs. We thus expand VLANeXt along several emerging directions, including model scaling, latent-action pretraining, latent predictive representation learning, and world action modeling. These studies give rise to the VLANeXt family, spanning compact and scaled VLA variants, latent-action models, JEPA-style predictive models, and World Action Models. Our results show that the core recipe provides a strong foundation across different model scales and emerging paradigms.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Read the original article: