arXiv:2602.06638v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Predictive confidence serves as a foundational control signal in mission-critical systems, directly governing risk-aware logic such as escalation, abstention, and conservative fallback. While prior federated learning attacks predominantly target accuracy or implant backdoors, we identify confidence calibration as a distinct attack objective. We present the Temperature Scaling Attack (TSA), a training-time attack that degrades calibration while preserving accuracy. By injecting temperature scaling with learning rate-temperature coupling during local training, TSA shifts model confidence while keeping predictive accuracy and common optimization signals close to benign training. We provide a convergence analysis under non-IID settings, showing that the coupling controls the primary update scale while leaving a bounded temperature-induced residual, yielding the standard non-convex FL convergence structure with an additional residual term. Across three benchmarks, TSA substantially shifts calibration (e.g., 145% error increase on CIFAR-100) with <2% accuracy change, and remains effective under robust aggregation and post-hoc calibration defenses. Case studies further show up to a 7.2x increase in missed verifications in healthcare and severe confidence-gating failures in autonomous driving, even when accuracy is unchanged. Overall, our results establish calibration integrity as a critical attack surface in federated learning.
Abstract: Predictive confidence serves as a foundational control signal in mission-critical systems, directly governing risk-aware logic such as escalation, abstention, and conservative fallback. While prior federated learning attacks predominantly target accuracy or implant backdoors, we identify confidence calibration as a distinct attack objective. We present the Temperature Scaling Attack (TSA), a training-time attack that degrades calibration while preserving accuracy. By injecting temperature scaling with learning rate-temperature coupling during local training, TSA shifts model confidence while keeping predictive accuracy and common optimization signals close to benign training. We provide a convergence analysis under non-IID settings, showing that the coupling controls the primary update scale while leaving a bounded temperature-induced residual, yielding the standard non-convex FL convergence structure with an additional residual term. Across three benchmarks, TSA substantially shifts calibration (e.g., 145% error increase on CIFAR-100) with <2% accuracy change, and remains effective under robust aggregation and post-hoc calibration defenses. Case studies further show up to a 7.2x increase in missed verifications in healthcare and severe confidence-gating failures in autonomous driving, even when accuracy is unchanged. Overall, our results establish calibration integrity as a critical attack surface in federated learning.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Read the original article: