arXiv:2608.19710v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Reliable underwater robotic perception remains difficult because optical imagery degrades under turbidity, wavelength-dependent attenuation, low illumination, scattering, and blur. Although sonar provides complementary information that is less affected by optical visibility, prior visual-sonar research has largely focused on feature alignment and nominal detection performance. We investigate cross-modal robustness as visual reliability deteriorates and assess whether pretrained visual foundation-model representations can be complemented by sonar under severe degradation. We use frozen DINOv2 as the visual encoder and construct a controlled five-level benchmark ranging from clean to extreme visual conditions. We compare conventional visual detection, frozen foundation-model representations, sonar context, fixed multimodal fusion, clean-trained adaptive gating, and degradation-aware gated fusion. Our method trains the fusion mechanism across the full range of degradation while keeping the visual and sonar encoders frozen, allowing modality contributions to adapt without fine-tuning the pretrained backbone. Under extreme combined degradation, the DINOv2 baseline achieves 0.4610 balanced accuracy, while degradation-aware visual-sonar fusion reaches 0.6152, a 33.5% relative improvement. The learned sonar contribution increases from 14.2% under clean conditions to 41.3% under extreme degradation, demonstrating adaptive redistribution of cross-modal reliance. Fusion provides the largest gains under severe turbidity and blur, whereas color attenuation alone yields little additional benefit. These results show that foundation-model representations remain valuable but insufficient under severe information loss, and that explicitly adapting fusion to modality reliability can improve robust underwater multimodal perception.
Abstract: Reliable underwater robotic perception remains difficult because optical imagery degrades under turbidity, wavelength-dependent attenuation, low illumination, scattering, and blur. Although sonar provides complementary information that is less affected by optical visibility, prior visual-sonar research has largely focused on feature alignment and nominal detection performance. We investigate cross-modal robustness as visual reliability deteriorates and assess whether pretrained visual foundation-model representations can be complemented by sonar under severe degradation. We use frozen DINOv2 as the visual encoder and construct a controlled five-level benchmark ranging from clean to extreme visual conditions. We compare conventional visual detection, frozen foundation-model representations, sonar context, fixed multimodal fusion, clean-trained adaptive gating, and degradation-aware gated fusion. Our method trains the fusion mechanism across the full range of degradation while keeping the visual and sonar encoders frozen, allowing modality contributions to adapt without fine-tuning the pretrained backbone. Under extreme combined degradation, the DINOv2 baseline achieves 0.4610 balanced accuracy, while degradation-aware visual-sonar fusion reaches 0.6152, a 33.5% relative improvement. The learned sonar contribution increases from 14.2% under clean conditions to 41.3% under extreme degradation, demonstrating adaptive redistribution of cross-modal reliance. Fusion provides the largest gains under severe turbidity and blur, whereas color attenuation alone yields little additional benefit. These results show that foundation-model representations remain valuable but insufficient under severe information loss, and that explicitly adapting fusion to modality reliability can improve robust underwater multimodal perception.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Read the original article: