arXiv:2608.14557v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Low Earth Orbit (LEO) computing is emerging for low-latency, globally distributed AI services, enabled by advances in satellite constellations and reusable launch systems. However, its sustainability remains unclear. Prior work introduces ESpaS, a framework for estimating lifecycle carbon intensity, but models systems using generic datacenter configurations and does not capture modern AI hardware, where power, mass, and compute characteristics vary widely and launch emissions scale with system mass. In this work, we extend ESpaS with accelerator-aware modeling and evaluate two representative systems: a lightweight Jetson AGX Orin for small satellites and a high-performance DGX H100 enabled by large-payload launch platforms. We show that launch emissions act as a fixed carbon overhead: low-mass systems minimize absolute emissions, while high-performance systems amortize this cost more effectively, reducing carbon intensity. Consequently, the space-ground tradeoff is highly sensitive to hardware choice, highlighting the need for accelerator-aware baselines in orbital AI computing.
Abstract: Low Earth Orbit (LEO) computing is emerging for low-latency, globally distributed AI services, enabled by advances in satellite constellations and reusable launch systems. However, its sustainability remains unclear. Prior work introduces ESpaS, a framework for estimating lifecycle carbon intensity, but models systems using generic datacenter configurations and does not capture modern AI hardware, where power, mass, and compute characteristics vary widely and launch emissions scale with system mass. In this work, we extend ESpaS with accelerator-aware modeling and evaluate two representative systems: a lightweight Jetson AGX Orin for small satellites and a high-performance DGX H100 enabled by large-payload launch platforms. We show that launch emissions act as a fixed carbon overhead: low-mass systems minimize absolute emissions, while high-performance systems amortize this cost more effectively, reducing carbon intensity. Consequently, the space-ground tradeoff is highly sensitive to hardware choice, highlighting the need for accelerator-aware baselines in orbital AI computing.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Read the original article: