arXiv:2608.00008v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: The local deployment of large language models (LLMs) is gaining traction due to privacy concerns and the desire for on-premise inference. However, the energy costs on consumer hardware remain poorly characterized, as most benchmarks focus solely on accuracy. This paper presents a reproducible, hardware-level energy benchmark of 18 open-source LLMs (0.5B to 7B parameters) executed on a single consumer GPU (RTX 4060ti 16GB). Using the Ollama inference engine, GPU power draw was sampled at 2hz via nvidia-smi across a fixed prompt set. We evaluate mean/peak power, total energy per prompt (J/prompt), energy per output token (J/tok), and throughput (tok/s). Our findings suggest that factors beyond raw parameter count, including model architecture and quantization strategy, drive energy efficiency. Specifically, qwen2.5:0.5b and tinyllama:1.1b achieve the lowest energy cost (0.2747 J/tok and 0.3234 J/tok) and the highest throughput (>325 tok/s). In contrast, the 7B-Mistral model consumes up to 8.6x more energy per token than the most efficient model. Notably, qwen3.5:0.8b(on) exhibits anomalously high per-prompt energy due to extended internal reasoning, highlighting the need to distinguish between token generation modes in efficiency metrics.
Abstract: The local deployment of large language models (LLMs) is gaining traction due to privacy concerns and the desire for on-premise inference. However, the energy costs on consumer hardware remain poorly characterized, as most benchmarks focus solely on accuracy. This paper presents a reproducible, hardware-level energy benchmark of 18 open-source LLMs (0.5B to 7B parameters) executed on a single consumer GPU (RTX 4060ti 16GB). Using the Ollama inference engine, GPU power draw was sampled at 2hz via nvidia-smi across a fixed prompt set. We evaluate mean/peak power, total energy per prompt (J/prompt), energy per output token (J/tok), and throughput (tok/s). Our findings suggest that factors beyond raw parameter count, including model architecture and quantization strategy, drive energy efficiency. Specifically, qwen2.5:0.5b and tinyllama:1.1b achieve the lowest energy cost (0.2747 J/tok and 0.3234 J/tok) and the highest throughput (>325 tok/s). In contrast, the 7B-Mistral model consumes up to 8.6x more energy per token than the most efficient model. Notably, qwen3.5:0.8b(on) exhibits anomalously high per-prompt energy due to extended internal reasoning, highlighting the need to distinguish between token generation modes in efficiency metrics.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Read the original article: