arXiv:2604.26703v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Scientific discovery often begins where observation and prediction disagree. As computation and machine learning survey chemical space, experiment-simulation mismatches are exposed at scale, while tracing them to physical mechanisms remains expert-led. Here we present eXplainable DFT (XDFT), a self-evolving agent that turns this process into an executable search. XDFT formalizes candidate mechanisms as executable hypotheses, adjudicates their consequences against experiment and distils trajectories into priors for later searches. This couples a solving loop from mismatch to mechanism with a learning loop through which solving changes the solver. Across 112 source-audited cases in which standard calculations predict a metal whereas experiments find a semiconductor, XDFT resolved 105 with evidence-supported mechanisms within a single-GPU envelope. After 60 cases, the resolving mechanism ranked among the first three hypotheses for 80% of held-out cases, up from 7% under the initial expert prior. XDFT also returned evidence-graded mechanisms for seven expert-curated questions about physical mechanisms. These results establish experiment-simulation mismatches as tractable starting points for scientific agents that discover physical mechanisms while learning how to find the next.
Abstract: Scientific discovery often begins where observation and prediction disagree. As computation and machine learning survey chemical space, experiment-simulation mismatches are exposed at scale, while tracing them to physical mechanisms remains expert-led. Here we present eXplainable DFT (XDFT), a self-evolving agent that turns this process into an executable search. XDFT formalizes candidate mechanisms as executable hypotheses, adjudicates their consequences against experiment and distils trajectories into priors for later searches. This couples a solving loop from mismatch to mechanism with a learning loop through which solving changes the solver. Across 112 source-audited cases in which standard calculations predict a metal whereas experiments find a semiconductor, XDFT resolved 105 with evidence-supported mechanisms within a single-GPU envelope. After 60 cases, the resolving mechanism ranked among the first three hypotheses for 80% of held-out cases, up from 7% under the initial expert prior. XDFT also returned evidence-graded mechanisms for seven expert-curated questions about physical mechanisms. These results establish experiment-simulation mismatches as tractable starting points for scientific agents that discover physical mechanisms while learning how to find the next.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Read the original article: