arXiv:2502.00213v5 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Transformers are difficult to optimize with stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and largely rely on adaptive optimizers such as Adam. Despite extensive efforts, the mechanisms behind Adam's advantage over SGD in Transformer optimization are still not fully understood. In this study, we analyze the optimization of Transformer models in the fine-tuning setting through the lens of gradient heterogeneity, defined as the variation in gradient norms across parameter blocks. We provide a theoretical analysis showing that gradient heterogeneity, together with Hessian heterogeneity, degrades the convergence of gradient-based methods such as SGD, while sign-based methods are substantially less sensitive to this effect. Adam and SignSGD both perform coordinate-wise updates and are less sensitive to the scale of individual gradient coordinates than SGD. This motivates our use of SignSGD as an analytically tractable proxy for Adam-like behavior. Our analysis uses the fact that SGD and SignSGD follow steepest descent directions under different norms, and derives upper bounds on the iteration complexity with implications for learning-rate scaling for SignSGD. We further investigate the origin of gradient heterogeneity in Transformer architectures and show that it is strongly influenced by the placement of layer normalization, with Post-LN architectures exhibiting particularly pronounced heterogeneity. Experimental results from fine-tuning Transformers in both NLP and vision domains validate our theoretical analysis.
Abstract: Transformers are difficult to optimize with stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and largely rely on adaptive optimizers such as Adam. Despite extensive efforts, the mechanisms behind Adam's advantage over SGD in Transformer optimization are still not fully understood. In this study, we analyze the optimization of Transformer models in the fine-tuning setting through the lens of gradient heterogeneity, defined as the variation in gradient norms across parameter blocks. We provide a theoretical analysis showing that gradient heterogeneity, together with Hessian heterogeneity, degrades the convergence of gradient-based methods such as SGD, while sign-based methods are substantially less sensitive to this effect. Adam and SignSGD both perform coordinate-wise updates and are less sensitive to the scale of individual gradient coordinates than SGD. This motivates our use of SignSGD as an analytically tractable proxy for Adam-like behavior. Our analysis uses the fact that SGD and SignSGD follow steepest descent directions under different norms, and derives upper bounds on the iteration complexity with implications for learning-rate scaling for SignSGD. We further investigate the origin of gradient heterogeneity in Transformer architectures and show that it is strongly influenced by the placement of layer normalization, with Post-LN architectures exhibiting particularly pronounced heterogeneity. Experimental results from fine-tuning Transformers in both NLP and vision domains validate our theoretical analysis.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Read the original article: