arXiv:2608.17634v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The $\operatorname{do}$-operator is described graphically by deleting arrows into its targets and functionally by replacing their mechanisms with constants. To call these operations equivalent is not yet a mathematical statement: one returns a graph and remembers only the targets, whereas the other returns mechanisms and also remembers the imposed values. We make a dependency-level comparison precise for deterministic acyclic structural causal models with finitely many endogenous variables. If $\operatorname{Graph}(F)$ extracts the dependencies of a mechanism family $F$, our main theorem is $\operatorname{Graph}(F^\iota)=\operatorname{Surg}(\operatorname{Graph}(F),T_\iota)$. Thus replacing target mechanisms removes exactly the dependencies removed by graph surgery. For a model $M=(G,F)$ whose graph may contain unused arrows, we characterize when the same equality holds with $G$ in place of $\operatorname{Graph}(F)$; it holds for every intervention exactly when $G$ records the dependencies of $F$ exactly. We then define the intervened model, characterize its run, show how sequential interventions combine, and prove that an outcome depends only on interventions at its actual dependency ancestors.
Abstract: The $\operatorname{do}$-operator is described graphically by deleting arrows into its targets and functionally by replacing their mechanisms with constants. To call these operations equivalent is not yet a mathematical statement: one returns a graph and remembers only the targets, whereas the other returns mechanisms and also remembers the imposed values. We make a dependency-level comparison precise for deterministic acyclic structural causal models with finitely many endogenous variables. If $\operatorname{Graph}(F)$ extracts the dependencies of a mechanism family $F$, our main theorem is $\operatorname{Graph}(F^\iota)=\operatorname{Surg}(\operatorname{Graph}(F),T_\iota)$. Thus replacing target mechanisms removes exactly the dependencies removed by graph surgery. For a model $M=(G,F)$ whose graph may contain unused arrows, we characterize when the same equality holds with $G$ in place of $\operatorname{Graph}(F)$; it holds for every intervention exactly when $G$ records the dependencies of $F$ exactly. We then define the intervened model, characterize its run, show how sequential interventions combine, and prove that an outcome depends only on interventions at its actual dependency ancestors.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Read the original article: