arXiv:2611.16590v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Long-term spacecraft autonomy requires embodied agents to use operational history under communication delays, time-critical operations, environmental uncertainty, complex physical interactions, power and computational constraints, and safety and reliability requirements. We introduce AstroMemBench and a Scenario-Challenge-Capability design method that maps these requirements to executable memory tests. The benchmark covers 16 memory subchallenges through 140 templates and 2240 instances across nine tasks in planetary surface operations, on-orbit servicing, and deep-space exploration. A deterministic environment scores actions for task completion, state changes, safety, and resource use. Ablations under nine conditions show that the benchmark is sensitive to how accurately agents recover and use historical information and to differences in memory-system design. Main experiments compare six configurations. Mem0, Chain-of-Memory, LightMem, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improve same-session mean scores over native Pi Agent, with no clear advantage of the three memory systems over RAG. After a session restart, Mem0 outperforms RAG by 12.25 points. Benefits favor instruction retention and result reuse over ongoing state tracking and energy reservation. AstroMemBench supports the design, development, and selection of memory systems for embodied spacecraft agents. AstroMemBench 1.0 and its evaluation code are publicly available: https://github.com/flyingView/AstroMemBench-v1.
Abstract: Long-term spacecraft autonomy requires embodied agents to use operational history under communication delays, time-critical operations, environmental uncertainty, complex physical interactions, power and computational constraints, and safety and reliability requirements. We introduce AstroMemBench and a Scenario-Challenge-Capability design method that maps these requirements to executable memory tests. The benchmark covers 16 memory subchallenges through 140 templates and 2240 instances across nine tasks in planetary surface operations, on-orbit servicing, and deep-space exploration. A deterministic environment scores actions for task completion, state changes, safety, and resource use. Ablations under nine conditions show that the benchmark is sensitive to how accurately agents recover and use historical information and to differences in memory-system design. Main experiments compare six configurations. Mem0, Chain-of-Memory, LightMem, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improve same-session mean scores over native Pi Agent, with no clear advantage of the three memory systems over RAG. After a session restart, Mem0 outperforms RAG by 12.25 points. Benefits favor instruction retention and result reuse over ongoing state tracking and energy reservation. AstroMemBench supports the design, development, and selection of memory systems for embodied spacecraft agents. AstroMemBench 1.0 and its evaluation code are publicly available: https://github.com/flyingView/AstroMemBench-v1.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Read the original article:
AstroMemBench: A Benchmark for Memory Systems in Embodied Spacecraft Agents