Abstract: Multimodal (e.g. vision-language, in this work) attribution aims to interpret the models without access to ground-truth explanatory supervision. Existing multimodal attribution methods typically rely on paired modalities as proxy supervision, implicitly assuming that image-text pairs are semantically aligned. Information bottleneck (IB)-based attribution methods follow this general paradigm and instantiate it through a global sufficiency-compression objective. In realistic multimodal datasets, however, this assumption is frequently violated due to partial semantic misalignment and unreliable cross-modal correspondences. Through theoretical analysis, we show that, under such misalignment, information-bottleneck-based attribution objectives exhibit a structural limitation: by assuming equal reliability across all proxy supervision signals, they induce posterior over-contraction and forced explanations. To address this issue, we propose TIB, a sample-wise Tempered Information Bottleneck framework that adaptively modulates attribution strength according to cross-modal reliability, without assuming semantic alignment. Extensive experiments on controlled benchmarks and large-scale datasets show the effectiveness of the proposed approach, while also validating the identified failure mode.
Read the original article:
