arXiv:2611.08655v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Retail product catalogs assembled from web image search are cheap to build and pervasively noisy: queries return packaging shots instead of products, and entries proliferate under names that cannot be distinguished visually. Consolidating such a catalog can look like an alternative to scaling the model. We show this is not a comparison between two ways of improving a recognizer, but between improving a recognizer and changing what counts as correct. We study a public archive of 165,769 cheese images across 1,824 query-named entries. A packaging filter and near-duplicate removal reduce it to a 998-class recognition set on one fixed, group-aware split. Canonicalizing entries to their base type (844 classes) raises top-1 accuracy by 4.0 points. Scoring the unchanged model against the merged label space, by summing its predicted probability within each canonical group, recovers +4.27 points with no retraining (+4.25 over six seeds). Retraining on the consolidated catalog then adds -0.10$\pm$0.53, +0.08$\pm$0.65 and -0.10$\pm$0.65 points at 28, 50 and 88 M parameters, indistinguishable from zero at every capacity ($\pm$ is the across-seed standard deviation). That component is specific, not mechanical: random merges with the identical size profile yield only +0.68 points, and the three backbones agree to within 0.1 points. But it is overwhelmingly category coarsening, not alias correction: across the 37 merged groups, type coarsenings supply 94% of the gain and alias collapses only 7%. We also detect no interaction between consolidation and backbone size: tripling backbone parameters is worth +1.50$\pm$0.57 points on the raw catalog and +1.42$\pm$00.44 on the canonical one, a within-seed interaction of -0.08 [-0.79,+0.63]. On this archive, the reported consolidation gain primarily reflects the evaluation label space, and separating that out costs one evaluation
Abstract: Retail product catalogs assembled from web image search are cheap to build and pervasively noisy: queries return packaging shots instead of products, and entries proliferate under names that cannot be distinguished visually. Consolidating such a catalog can look like an alternative to scaling the model. We show this is not a comparison between two ways of improving a recognizer, but between improving a recognizer and changing what counts as correct. We study a public archive of 165,769 cheese images across 1,824 query-named entries. A packaging filter and near-duplicate removal reduce it to a 998-class recognition set on one fixed, group-aware split. Canonicalizing entries to their base type (844 classes) raises top-1 accuracy by 4.0 points. Scoring the unchanged model against the merged label space, by summing its predicted probability within each canonical group, recovers +4.27 points with no retraining (+4.25 over six seeds). Retraining on the consolidated catalog then adds -0.10$\pm$0.53, +0.08$\pm$0.65 and -0.10$\pm$0.65 points at 28, 50 and 88 M parameters, indistinguishable from zero at every capacity ($\pm$ is the across-seed standard deviation). That component is specific, not mechanical: random merges with the identical size profile yield only +0.68 points, and the three backbones agree to within 0.1 points. But it is overwhelmingly category coarsening, not alias correction: across the 37 merged groups, type coarsenings supply 94% of the gain and alias collapses only 7%. We also detect no interaction between consolidation and backbone size: tripling backbone parameters is worth +1.50$\pm$0.57 points on the raw catalog and +1.42$\pm$00.44 on the canonical one, a within-seed interaction of -0.08 [-0.79,+0.63]. On this archive, the reported consolidation gain primarily reflects the evaluation label space, and separating that out costs one evaluation
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Read the original article: