Abstract: Reinforcement learning with scalar rewards is widely used for aligning machine-learning systems with user preferences. But, pairwise preferences are often more natural for users to specify than scalar rewards, and they express certain goals that scalar rewards cannot. Methods for reinforcement learning with pairwise preferences have thus received growing interest. Unfortunately, these methods are inefficient in problems with long time horizons, and they lack guarantees on the performance of Markov policies relative to history-dependent policies, which bridge the theory and practice of reinforcement learning. We address these limitations in a new problem setting for reinforcement learning with pairwise preferences called the \textit{Markov decision contest}. In this setting, we prove that stationary Markov policies perform just as well as history-dependent policies; that the problem of recovering an optimal policy exactly is in P; and that a simple iterative algorithm converges to an optimal policy at a sublinear rate. Lastly, we implement a deep-learning variant of our iterative algorithm and demonstrate its efficiency in long-term decision problems that require function approximation.
Read the original article: