arXiv:2610.35607v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Reward guidance steers a pretrained diffusion or flow model toward images or actions that a reward model prefers, at sampling time and without retraining the model for each reward. It follows the gradient of a value function, the expected reward given the noisy state. The two common estimates of this gradient, gradients through a one-step denoised estimate and learned value models, are least accurate at high noise, where the coarse structure of the sample is decided. Interestingly, we find that both errors are posterior covariances, which grow with the uncertainty about the clean sample, and hence at higher noise. To reduce them, we evaluate the value at a less noisy state, one sampler step ahead, where this uncertainty is smaller, and pull its gradient back to the current state. This lookahead places both estimators at the two ends of one family and reveals that an intermediate lookahead requires one additional term, a correction through the generator. We therefore propose Value Gradient Lookahead and Pullback (VaLoP), which computes this correction with one vector-Jacobian product, and VaLoP-Fast, which amortizes it with a small head that, for text-to-image models, is trained with a single reward and reused for the others. Across various models, rewards, and benchmark datasets, both robustly outperform existing value-gradient guidance on the target reward, VaLoP-Fast at about the cost of learned-value guidance. Both extend to critic-guided robot policies, where VaLoP-Fast attains the highest success rates on LIBERO and RoboCasa.
Abstract: Reward guidance steers a pretrained diffusion or flow model toward images or actions that a reward model prefers, at sampling time and without retraining the model for each reward. It follows the gradient of a value function, the expected reward given the noisy state. The two common estimates of this gradient, gradients through a one-step denoised estimate and learned value models, are least accurate at high noise, where the coarse structure of the sample is decided. Interestingly, we find that both errors are posterior covariances, which grow with the uncertainty about the clean sample, and hence at higher noise. To reduce them, we evaluate the value at a less noisy state, one sampler step ahead, where this uncertainty is smaller, and pull its gradient back to the current state. This lookahead places both estimators at the two ends of one family and reveals that an intermediate lookahead requires one additional term, a correction through the generator. We therefore propose Value Gradient Lookahead and Pullback (VaLoP), which computes this correction with one vector-Jacobian product, and VaLoP-Fast, which amortizes it with a small head that, for text-to-image models, is trained with a single reward and reused for the others. Across various models, rewards, and benchmark datasets, both robustly outperform existing value-gradient guidance on the target reward, VaLoP-Fast at about the cost of learned-value guidance. Both extend to critic-guided robot policies, where VaLoP-Fast attains the highest success rates on LIBERO and RoboCasa.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
