arXiv:2610.32281v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Negation occurs in every language, yet its surface realization differs drastically. Despite this, multilingual large language models (LLMs) translate negation robustly, raising the question of whether they share an underlying representation of negation across languages. We study this question in six open models across English, French, Vietnamese, and Chinese, using causal interventions on a synthetic contrastive dataset and a negation translation dataset derived from FLORES-200. Across models, we find strong evidence that negation representations are causally controllable and largely shared across languages. In particular, we show that a contrastive activation direction extracted from one language can induce or remove negation in the others, and directions extracted from different languages are substantially aligned. We further find that negation is represented in sparse features: a single sparse autoencoder (SAE) feature per model suffices to control polarity across languages, while responding selectively to negated inputs. Finally, both dense and sparse interventions generalize to four additional languages and FLORES-derived sentences. We release data and code to support future work: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/negation-translation/.
Abstract: Negation occurs in every language, yet its surface realization differs drastically. Despite this, multilingual large language models (LLMs) translate negation robustly, raising the question of whether they share an underlying representation of negation across languages. We study this question in six open models across English, French, Vietnamese, and Chinese, using causal interventions on a synthetic contrastive dataset and a negation translation dataset derived from FLORES-200. Across models, we find strong evidence that negation representations are causally controllable and largely shared across languages. In particular, we show that a contrastive activation direction extracted from one language can induce or remove negation in the others, and directions extracted from different languages are substantially aligned. We further find that negation is represented in sparse features: a single sparse autoencoder (SAE) feature per model suffices to control polarity across languages, while responding selectively to negated inputs. Finally, both dense and sparse interventions generalize to four additional languages and FLORES-derived sentences. We release data and code to support future work: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/negation-translation/.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Read the original article:
“Not” is Not Lost in Translation: A Causal Analysis of Negation Representations in Multilingual LLMs