arXiv:2610.12507v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Sensing-aided beam prediction can reduce the beam-training overhead of millimeter-wave (mmWave) systems by leveraging environmental information from complementary modalities such as vision and position. However, the resulting sensing and inference pipeline can be energy-intensive, motivating the use of energy-efficient spiking neural networks (SNNs) as an alternative to conventional artificial neural networks (ANNs). In this work, we develop SNN architectures for beam prediction and systematically compare them with ANNs using position-only, vision-only, and multimodal inputs. Our results show that compact ANNs consistently outperform SNNs for position-only sensing. In contrast, for vision and multimodal sensing, SNNs achieve higher accuracy than ANNs at similar energy costs and require up to an order of magnitude less energy at a comparable accuracy. For example, the multimodal SNN achieves 58.08% top-1 accuracy, outperforming the closest-energy ANN by 18.11 percentage points. We further show that SNN accuracy is limited by the binary communication between layers rather than by model size. These results demonstrate the potential of SNNs for energy-efficient sensing-aided beam prediction while highlighting their accuracy limitation.
Abstract: Sensing-aided beam prediction can reduce the beam-training overhead of millimeter-wave (mmWave) systems by leveraging environmental information from complementary modalities such as vision and position. However, the resulting sensing and inference pipeline can be energy-intensive, motivating the use of energy-efficient spiking neural networks (SNNs) as an alternative to conventional artificial neural networks (ANNs). In this work, we develop SNN architectures for beam prediction and systematically compare them with ANNs using position-only, vision-only, and multimodal inputs. Our results show that compact ANNs consistently outperform SNNs for position-only sensing. In contrast, for vision and multimodal sensing, SNNs achieve higher accuracy than ANNs at similar energy costs and require up to an order of magnitude less energy at a comparable accuracy. For example, the multimodal SNN achieves 58.08% top-1 accuracy, outperforming the closest-energy ANN by 18.11 percentage points. We further show that SNN accuracy is limited by the binary communication between layers rather than by model size. These results demonstrate the potential of SNNs for energy-efficient sensing-aided beam prediction while highlighting their accuracy limitation.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Read the original article: