arXiv:2608.09946v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Social service navigation requires connecting help-seeking individuals to resources that satisfy their needs and specific constraints. Although LLM agents offer a promising interface for conversational resource navigation, existing benchmarks do not capture the interaction complexity and constraint-grounding demands of this setting. We introduce HoosierHelp, an interactive benchmark grounded in 3,971 Indiana public social service resources. Agents interact with simulated users, issue structured resource-search calls, handle non-ideal interactions, and select the final resources returned by the tool. HoosierHelp enhances the realism of simulated users by varying their need structure, constraint satisfiability, and behavior patterns, including impatience, rambling, unsupported requests, and self-contradiction. Experiments on 240 samples across seven LLMs show that current LLM agents remain substantially unreliable for social service navigation. Performance drops sharply on fallback-required and self-contradictory conversations, highlighting the need for agents that are more robust to complex and non-ideal user interactions.
Abstract: Social service navigation requires connecting help-seeking individuals to resources that satisfy their needs and specific constraints. Although LLM agents offer a promising interface for conversational resource navigation, existing benchmarks do not capture the interaction complexity and constraint-grounding demands of this setting. We introduce HoosierHelp, an interactive benchmark grounded in 3,971 Indiana public social service resources. Agents interact with simulated users, issue structured resource-search calls, handle non-ideal interactions, and select the final resources returned by the tool. HoosierHelp enhances the realism of simulated users by varying their need structure, constraint satisfiability, and behavior patterns, including impatience, rambling, unsupported requests, and self-contradiction. Experiments on 240 samples across seven LLMs show that current LLM agents remain substantially unreliable for social service navigation. Performance drops sharply on fallback-required and self-contradictory conversations, highlighting the need for agents that are more robust to complex and non-ideal user interactions.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Read the original article: