arXiv:2609.09659v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Federated learning shares model updates rather than raw data, yet these updates can be inverted to reconstruct the clients' training data. Analytic reconstruction attacks, which invert a gradient in closed form, degrade as the batch grows: prior single-round attacks recover only about half of a batch of size $100$ even when the attacker fully controls the network parameters, and known upper bounds limit what any such method can recover. We establish a connection between gradient inversion and the theory of erasure-correcting codes, and use it to construct attacks that exceed these bounds. Our attacks recover batches exactly, together with every sample's label, from a single FedSGD round, and certify each recovery without ground-truth data. On eight image and tabular benchmarks they outperform prior single-round attacks by a wide margin. Even a passive attacker who only observes an honestly trained network recovers $94$–$100\%$ of ImageNet batches at sizes up to $128$, more than prior single-round attacks achieve even with active manipulation of the model, and in the active setting more than $90\%$ is recovered at batch sizes of several hundred. These results show that the privacy leakage of federated learning has been underestimated.
Abstract: Federated learning shares model updates rather than raw data, yet these updates can be inverted to reconstruct the clients' training data. Analytic reconstruction attacks, which invert a gradient in closed form, degrade as the batch grows: prior single-round attacks recover only about half of a batch of size $100$ even when the attacker fully controls the network parameters, and known upper bounds limit what any such method can recover. We establish a connection between gradient inversion and the theory of erasure-correcting codes, and use it to construct attacks that exceed these bounds. Our attacks recover batches exactly, together with every sample's label, from a single FedSGD round, and certify each recovery without ground-truth data. On eight image and tabular benchmarks they outperform prior single-round attacks by a wide margin. Even a passive attacker who only observes an honestly trained network recovers $94$–$100\%$ of ImageNet batches at sizes up to $128$, more than prior single-round attacks achieve even with active manipulation of the model, and in the active setting more than $90\%$ is recovered at batch sizes of several hundred. These results show that the privacy leakage of federated learning has been underestimated.
This article has been indexed from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Read the original article: